[SC-Help] Re: Confused

[Luke O'Connell]

Well basically the macro I use (which sends the headers to SpamCop) is
either leaving the lines in or putting them there, I am not sure, but either
way; I have now emailed the author and as soon as he changes code we are
ready to go.

I think SpamCop needs to document this more, for a novice user like myself
(in the field of spam), I just had no idea that blank spaces in the header
information would cause problems.

Many thanks for all your help,

Luke O'Connell


"Spam Hater" <ohubp6n02 at sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:mailman.43.1054319682.25644.spamcop-help at news.spamcop.net...
> Who is adding the extra blank lines in the header?  Is it your script or
> did you just make a mistake when posting here?  If you are passing the
> headers to SpamCop just as you have posted them here, then that is your
> problem.  As soon as SpamCop encounters a blank line it assumes that it
> has hit the end of the header.  Since it didn't get everything it expected
> to see in a proper header, it gives you the error message that you are
> seeing.  If you remove the blank lines, everything should parse fine.
>
> To summarize, all the headers need to be together in one group, followed
> by a blank line and then the body of the SPAM.
>
> At 06:28 PM 5/30/2003 +0100, Luke O'Connell typed:
>
> >Hey there,
> >
> >Well I am unfortunetely using Microsoft Outlook XP, so the header system
is
> >quite complicated, however I use a macro program to extract the headers
and
> >forward them to SpamCop.
> >
> >I am almost sure this is not the case, a friend of mine looked through
the
> >headers and found no problems with it. Below is an example header which
was
> >returned; you can clearly see the source IP address:
> >
> >Received: from cdm-66-125-51-jone.cox-internet.com ([66.76.125.51])
> >        by neodymium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #23)
> >        id 19LmC9-0003nb-00; Fri, 30 May 2003 16:53:33 +0100
> >Received: from nzrw.7gmp.net ([87.161.34.187]) by
> >cdm-66-125-51-jone.cox-internet.com SMTP id 9xTrMLsYwuG1Rk; Fri, 30 May
2003
> >15:44:41 -0100
> >
> >Message-ID: <a531a-2$fs9d5k-3r at u60.a.yh.20u>
> >From: "Rosalinda Phelps" <1d5v12nkbue at earthlink.net>
> >To: luke.elwick at btinternet.com
> >Cc: <luke.hutson at btinternet.com>, <luke.morley at btinternet.com>,
> ><luke.oconnell at btinternet.com>, <luke.ottaway at btinternet.com>,
> ><luke.pebody at btinternet.com>, <luke.razzell at btinternet.com>
> >
> >Subject: More powerful intense orgasms chjllh
> >Date: Fri, 30 May 03 15:44:41 GMT
> >X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> >        boundary="C542.F728D_03F1_8D3"
> >X-Priority: 3
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >Status:
> >
> >I have no idea why this is happening but it is frustrating; if anyone can
> >tell anything from the header above I would be very grateful to hear from
> >you.
> >
> >Many thanks,
> >
> >Luke O'Connell
> >luke.oconnell at btinternet.com
> >
> >
> >"Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in message
> >news:bb7s2v$7dn$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> >> Luke O'Connell wrote:
> >> > I have sent 8 messages so
> >> > far, and only two of them have been successful, the others have
> >> > returned:
> >> >
> >> > Header incomplete, aborting.
> >> > No source IP address found, cannot proceed. Not full header?
> >>
> >> Sent how?  Pasted into the web parser or emailed?  If emailed, how?  If
> >> emailed with Outlook Express did you select the item and click "Forward
> >> as attachment"?  From under the Message menu or from R clicked context
> >> menu.  If pasted into the webform did you get the complete headers with
> >> spambody attached by using the instructions at
> >> http://spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/119.html <oneline> ?  Preferably the
> >> bottom half of that page.