[SC-Help] Re: image reporting
gospamming at yourdomain.invalid
Thu Apr 15 08:19:29 EDT 2004
"RandallW" <flippetyfloo at fake.com> wrote in
news:c5lbv4$l60$1 at news.spamcop.net:
> Does anyone think the Spamcop parser should be allowed to detect the
> urls of the image references in spam?
No, I think it is a bad idea. It is just too easy to grab *any* image
from the web at a gazillion innocent web sites to add it in a spam and
still make sense. The Spamcop parser would have no clue as to
distinguish innocent bystanders from actual spammer-hosted images.
Spamvertized web sites is another thing; a spammer cannot easily add
innocent third party web links which make sense to his spam...
My Personal email: ddiazxn @ telefonica . net
More information about the SpamCop-Help