[SC-Help] Re: image reporting

[D.Diaz]

"RandallW" <flippetyfloo at fake.com> wrote in
news:c5lbv4$l60$1 at news.spamcop.net: 

> Does anyone think the Spamcop parser should be allowed to detect the
> urls of the image references in spam?
> 

No, I think it is a bad idea.  It is just too easy to grab *any* image
from the web at a gazillion innocent web sites to add it in a spam and
still make sense.  The Spamcop parser would have no clue as to
distinguish innocent bystanders from actual spammer-hosted images. 
Spamvertized web sites is another thing; a spammer cannot easily add
innocent third party web links which make sense to his spam... 

-- 
Daniel Diaz
My Personal email: ddiazxn @ telefonica . net