[SC-Help] topic change ( to removal urls )
flippetyfloo at fake.com
Fri Apr 16 01:43:34 EDT 2004
"Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in message
news:c5lldi$rg8$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> RandallW wrote:
> > Does anyone think the Spamcop parser should be allowed to detect the
> > urls of the image references in spam?
> Since I think that sometimes 'temporarily' making an issue more complex
> can contribute to the 'simplicity' of a solution to a question, I'll
> throw in this opinion, which is 'oblique' to the issue...
> I also don't think that Remove website links should be reported. I
> realize that the vast majority of them are one and the same as the
> spamvertised link, so in that case the issue is moot, because I do
> believe in reporting spamvertised links ;-) but I consider the
> reporting of a Remove link which is a separate and different provider to
> be 'assuming facts not in evidence'. I uncheck them on the spamcop
> report and don't report them manually.
What percentage of removal urls are stolen? That is, the removal website
belongs to someone else.
More information about the SpamCop-Help