[SC-Help] Re: "No links found" tracker

[eddie]

On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 00:12:19 -0700, Anon_ scratched out the following:

snip
> I  disagree!
> 
> The 'materially changed' reports, even if labeled as such are STILL under
> the SC "imprinter" and would dilute the impact that SC wants to make on
> the ISPs to which it sends reports.
> 
> It cannot afford any weakening of its resolve to be as accurate as
> possible and is known, now, for its integretiy in reporting.

Who is talking about changing the reports? I think you are misreading what
has been posted. All I am suggesting is adding abuse addresses by parsing
the report in a more effective manner. What does that have to do with
material changes in the report? Please explain what you mean.
The reports would be exactly the same as always - just a few more check
boxes for additional abuse addresses that show up.
Again, I don't think anybody is talking about making any changes at all to
the report. At least not to my knowledge.