[SC-Help] Re: Time Traveling Spam ? Or new way to beat Spamcop ?
db
ob1db at spamcop.net
Mon Feb 9 00:17:19 EST 2004
"Ellen" <nobody at spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:c06o5k$2c4$1 at news.spamcop.net...
>
> "db" <ob1db at spamcop.net> wrote in message
> news:c06co5$o8r$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> > Hmm, looks backdated, see full spam in .spam
> >
> > Note ALL headers show old dates for spam that arrived (and is dated)
> > Saturday!
> >
> >
> > X-Apparently-To: x via 66.218.93.12; Sat, 31 Jan 2004
> > 11:49:35 -0800
> > X-YahooFilteredBulk: 66.65.192.228
> > Return-Path: <vt242zu at aol.com>
> > Received: from 66.65.192.228 (HELO
> > alb-66-65-192-228.nycap.rr.com) (66.65.192.228) by
> mta167.mail.scd.yahoo.com
> > with SMTP; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:49:34 -0800
> <snip>
> >
> > (ok to put the headers here, right ?)
> >
> > I "corrected" the dates and it parsed correctly...
> >
> Either the yahoo server is stamping the wrong date or it sat in your
mailbox
> a long time before you noticed it. Of course if you change the datestamp
it
> will parse fine if the problem is "too old ..." *however* if you do that
and
> submit spam reports then you will have your account suspended as that is
> *definitely* not allowed.
>
Nope, was fresh yesterday. Note the SENT date on the message itsself. I am
SURE it was the sender's servers.
More information about the SpamCop-Help
mailing list