[SC-Help] Re: Submitting Norton Antivirus quarantined spam ?
nobody at devnull.spamcop.net
Sat Jul 31 14:28:40 EDT 2004
"Mike Easter" wrote in message
> Glenn Daniels wrote:
> source = 220.127.116.11 no rDNS = abuse at charter.net
> > mungecast is
> > overtly liable
Yup! It works for me, I like the way it sounds, and it avoids
saying what I mean without stopping me from meaning
what I say. What? You got a problem with mungecast?
I know perfectly well where the reports went and so do
they. I provided an ample disclaimer.
Looks to me like you followed the link and saw what you
wanted to see. Someone else looks and says, oh, look,
he forged the IP. I know what I have in my virm bank,
and it looks to me like you know. What I need are other
virm bankers who are armed with virms and ready and
willing to take on yourcallISP. If the ISP's can't be held
accountable for the harm they do, who else is there?
Yes, I rather like mungecast. It is that or virmizen. But
charter? Nah!, don't go there, I really don't like the
sound of that. Besides, they have never let me down
on these things before. Mungecast, yes, mungecast is
good. Especially when they are clearly responsible for
an ample portion of my daily injection of spam.
Definitely. You think it was Freudian? Not this time.
What does it mean? You decide.
More information about the SpamCop-Help