[SC-Help] Re: spam traps
Merlyn at Spamcop.net
Thu Sep 9 12:09:45 EDT 2004
"Anna Boytsova" <nwarrior at i.com.ua> wrote in message
news:chpqg8$jcs$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> > > > > I'm the abuse master of the ISP that has server 184.108.40.206
> > > >
> > > > Then you should register a proper abuse address with the appropriate
> > > > authorities: SpamCop has no mind-readers and can only report to the
> > > > registered abuse address.
> > >
> > > According to spamcop abuse reports go to
> > > Using abuse net on abuse <at> iptelecom.ua
> > > abuse net iptelecom.ua = abuse <at> iptelecom.ua
> > > Using best contacts abuse <at> iptelecom.ua
> > SpamCop chanage record to correct only yesterday.....
> Ohh....! It's becoming just ridiculous...
> I wrote to deputies <at> admin.spamcop.net on 2 of September that SC
> corrected a mistake in our contact address.
> They said OK, they correct.
> But I see the same wrong record...
> For example here: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?track=220.127.116.11
> Then I wrote to SC once again on 3th Sept....and once again on 8th of
> and there is silence.... nobody answers, and nobody corrects our
> And then in one fine day our server block because of spam and we just
> know the reason because didn't receive any complaint!
> Somebody who sits near, wake up spamcop deputies or some person who do can
> read e-mails :))
Look at the following record from the RIPE database:
(Check the remarks)
inetnum: 18.104.22.168 - 22.214.171.124
descr: IPTelecom Ltd.
remarks: please, e-mail spam and abuse reports to abuse at iptelecom.ua
This is the info posted in the public records for that IP address.
Is iptelecom.ua posting invalid information?
A Spamcop advocate
No emails this account is for newsgroups only
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which
More information about the SpamCop-Help