[SC-Help] Re: spam traps

[Merlyn]

"Anna Boytsova" <nwarrior at i.com.ua> wrote in message
news:chpqg8$jcs$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> > > > > I'm the abuse master of the ISP that has server 212.9.224.21
> > > >
> > > > Then you should register a proper abuse address with the appropriate
> > > > authorities: SpamCop has no mind-readers and can only report to the
> > > > registered abuse address.
> > >
> > > According to spamcop abuse reports go to
> > > Using abuse net on abuse <at> iptelecom.ua
> > > abuse net iptelecom.ua = abuse <at> iptelecom.ua
> > > Using best contacts abuse <at> iptelecom.ua
> >
> > SpamCop chanage record to correct only yesterday.....
>
> Ohh....! It's becoming just ridiculous...
> I wrote to deputies  <at>  admin.spamcop.net  on 2 of September that SC
have
> corrected a mistake in our contact address.
> They said OK, they correct.
> But I see the same wrong record...
> For example here: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?track=213.159.232.1
>
> Then I wrote to SC once again on 3th Sept....and once again on 8th of
> Sept....
> and there is silence.... nobody answers, and nobody corrects our
adress....
> And then in one fine day our server block because of spam and we just
don't
> know the reason because didn't receive any complaint!
>
> Somebody who sits near, wake up spamcop deputies or some person who do can
> read e-mails :))



Look at the following record from the RIPE database:

(Check the remarks)

inetnum:      213.159.232.0 - 213.159.232.255
netname:      LL-IPTUA
descr:        IPTelecom Ltd.

[info snipped]

remarks:      ===========================================================
remarks:      please, e-mail spam and abuse reports to abuse at iptelecom.ua
remarks:      ===========================================================


This is the info posted in the public records for that IP address.

Is iptelecom.ua posting invalid information?

-- 

Regards,
Merlyn

A Spamcop advocate
No emails this account is for newsgroups only
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which
they avoided