[SC-Help] Re: Spamcop treats MX differently depending on where it appears in chain

[Blammo]

On 02 Apr 2005 Blammo entered spamcop.help and left
news:Xns962C630DEBC09blammo at 216.154.195.61: 

>>> In your first example, why doesn't isp-other-name.mx match
>>> 4dmail.co.uk? 
>>>
>> Because isp-other-name.mx is one of the MXs for the other name by
>> which my ISP is known. I said that in one of the comments you
>> snipped. 4dmail.co.uk was the source of that mail.
> 
> The MX name has nothing to do with it, we only see two things here,
> the IP and the name the server writes into the header, which doesn't
> match for some odd reason. Your answer doesn't explain why they don't
> match. You haven't explained why "by isp-other-name.mx (Postfix)"
> claims it's name is "4dmail.co.uk", that would mean Postfix is not
> configured properly. 
> 

Oh, wait, you mean you have the headers reversed? I was thinking you had 
them reversed, but I don't see why you would want to confuse us like that.

-- 
| Ric