[SC-Help] Re: Help -- Am I reporting myself?

[Mike Easter]

Mike Easter wrote:
> This is about this spam item:
>
www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z756267518zb2feeede0a3655990a78c951d01da47dz
>
> which has these abbreviated Received tracelines:
>
>   Abbreviated Received lines *comment
>   from unknown (192.168.1.103) by blade1.cesmail.net *serves you
>   from mout.perfora.net (217.160.230.41) by mailgate2.cesmail.net
> *serves you
>   from dsl43.rbh1.pppoe.execulink.com[66.203.183.43] by mx.perfora.net
> *sourceline
>   from (217.160.230.10) by mx9.uti.com *bogusline

Incidentally;  your own provider's line, #3 of 4 above, 'by
mx.perfora.net' is noncompliant in that it does not contain a timestamp.

The entire non-abbreviated line sez:

Received: from dsl43.rbh1.pppoe.execulink.com[66.203.183.43] by
mx.perfora.net[172.19.34.100] (Nemesis), id 0MKuxu-1DPsAO0DQw-0000Q1

Besides the timestamp, it also needs a space between the 'from' field's
IP [66.203.183.43] and that helo or rDNS which precedes it.

None of that has anything to do with this problem I don't think, but
whenever you tell your provider's rep Maximilian Ferstl about your plan
to cease reporting them as a spamsource, you could also mention these
little stamp problems.


-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin