[SC-Help] Re: Fake bounce defeats Spamcop (again)
Martin Edwards
buzzard554 at fastmail.co.uk
Thu Feb 3 18:25:02 EST 2005
Mike Easter wrote:
> Martin Edwards wrote:
> www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z728091513z67ff16d4bd1c5ad4df2b459b9e1eaeacz
>
>>I was parsing the headers only for manual reporting. It nearly always
>>works, and I don't think I left anything in that looks like a body.
>
>
>>Same thing:
>>
>
> www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z728092768z6a8dea18d7f2e1aa1cf98ac04833e78cz
>
> Both of those 'suffer' from the condition of the bottom trace Received
> line not being 'folded' properly. If I clean it up by removing the
> returns from that bottom line on each of them, then the header with no
> body will parse properly.
>
> www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z728100877zbb47adbcd36360cd302b39052b261134z
> Received: from mzcf ([62.0.66.142])
>
> www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z728099746z44f0a06e0d4ef8f93902fbdf2cb8f9e0z
> Received: from ldxulow ([62.0.66.142])
>
> Presumably the problem with the improper line configuration lies with
> the server for the dialup 62.0.66.142 rDNS
> dialup-62-0-66-142.tlv.netvision.net.il -- namely
> mxout5.netvision.net.il DNS 194.90.9.29
>
Thanks. I'll check for that next time.
More information about the SpamCop-Help
mailing list