[SC-Help] Re: Spammers getting smarter?
Geoff Lane
geoff at nospam.gjctech.co.uk
Wed Feb 9 01:01:52 EST 2005
"Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in
news:cubmnu$bje$1 at news.spamcop.net:
> Here's what SP sez about how it works its whitelisting, from the
> manual. This is very typical for whitelisting.
>
> <snip>
> Note: Headers that the whitelist compares against
> The whitelist function only looks for email addresses in certain
> headers of your email.
>
> These headers are currently: From:, Reply-To:, Sender:, Mailing-List:
> and Return-Path:
> </snip>
>
> So, if I look back at the 'Wrongly accused' thread first item with the
> headers, I see this useful line:
>
> Reply-To: tbudl at thebat.dutaint.com
---
Ah! now that's not wot it sez in my SP help! I'm a version or two behind
(1.583) and the help only mentions the From: header. Certainly I did try
some time ago to whitelist on the Reply-To: header but it didn't work. I
even wrote to suggest just that feature, but didn't know it had been
implemented.
So, perhaps it's time to accept the update that Spampal offered a couple
of days ago. That will let me tidy things up significantly.
Thanks,
--
Geoff Lane
Cornwall, UK
More information about the SpamCop-Help
mailing list