[SpamCop.net - protecting the internet through technology]

[SC-Help] Re: SpamCop leaking addresses

Mike Easter MikeE at ster.invalid
Sat Feb 19 13:58:08 EST 2005


nobody wrote:
> I agree that munging the Received lines is overkill. I think Phil did
> it for this example because some of the cc: recipients are exposed.

'Extra' mungeing not described in the faq isn't going to be blessed by
anyone in charge, but personally I don't see anything wrong with
throwing out the whole CC: section -- but that's just my opinion.  If I
were the mungeing meister I would bless that before I would bless
mucking with the from and by field tracelines preparse.

-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin



More information about the SpamCop-Help mailing list