[SC-Help] Re: roving.com spammers stay out of spamcop

[McWebber]

"D.Diaz" <gospamming at yourdomain.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns95DBD1C74937Axnddmxn at 216.154.195.61...
>
> Now, another question I'm asking myself is... how many of those spams
> emanating from the "bonded" IP address have been reported to
> abuse at bondedsender.com so they get fined as per BondedSender's policy?
>

Wanna bet you just get unsubscribed if you send them an unmunged report? As
far as the lack of NANAS reports go, it's a little hard to report blocked
spam.

[root mail]# grep roving /var/log/maillog
Jan 11 06:57:31 admin sendmail[431]: j0BCvQY00431: ruleset=check_relay,
arg1=ccm01.roving.com, arg2=63.251.135.74, relay=ccm01.roving.com
[63.251.135.74], reject=550 5.0.0 fuck off spammer
Jan 11 10:32:49 admin sendmail[23421]: j0BGWiY23421: ruleset=check_relay,
arg1=ccm09.roving.com, arg2=63.251.135.115, relay=ccm09.roving.com
[63.251.135.115], reject=550 5.0.0 fuck off spammer
Jan 11 12:28:28 admin sendmail[5727]: j0BISNY05727: ruleset=check_relay,
arg1=mailface.roving.com, arg2=63.251.135.75, relay=mailface.roving.com
[63.251.135.75], reject=550 5.0.0 fuck off spammer
Jan 11 15:59:41 admin sendmail[869]: j0BLxaY00869: ruleset=check_relay,
arg1=ccm01.roving.com, arg2=63.251.135.74, relay=ccm01.roving.com
[63.251.135.74], reject=550 5.0.0 fuck off spammer
Jan 11 17:27:21 admin sendmail[11745]: j0BNRGY11745: ruleset=check_relay,
arg1=mailface.roving.com, arg2=63.251.135.75, relay=mailface.roving.com
[63.251.135.75], reject=550 5.0.0 fuck off spammer

It goes like that every day. They ignore rejections and just keep sending
despite hard bounces.

-- 
McWebber
"Richter points to the lack of legal action against his company as proof
that he's operating appropriately."
Information Week, November 10, 2003