[SC-Help] Re: Getting balcklisted

[Iain]

"Pop" <nobody at spamcop.net> wrote in message 
news:cs90a6$56o$1 at news.spamcop.net...

> IMO, your response is more of a statement that you intend to do it your 
> way regardless, as opposed to an open mind trying to get  a head around 
> the issues in a way you can deal with them.


Sorry you read it that way, however if I intended to do it 'my 
way' -whatever that might be - there'd be not point in posting originally. 
My reason for exploring the issues is I need not only to be sure in my own 
mind, but convince a large Government body to do it the way I suggest and 
not to cut corners which others will suggest. I therefore need to think 
through every issue and have an answer for every question else they - not 
me - will do it *their* way. It's not my development budget, it's theirs, 
and I need to be clear about why they must include certain steps and 
probably spend more money. I need a complete and convincing case for why 
they can't do it as being proposed by the 'marketing guys' - and yes, 
Government tax departments do have people they refer to as 'marketing' - 
people trying to encourage online service take-up - hence 'welcome messages' 
and hassle-free (as *they* see it) subscription options.

Personally I'm finding the discussion with Mike *extremely* helpful. I still 
have more issues to explore and can only hope he and others will be kind 
enough to continue to provide me their own views and lessons of experience.

.../Iain