[SC-Help] Re: Forced perspective spam

[Pop]

It's certainly not a Miracle wrote:
> pop said:
>> What's the point of this? There are
>> many, many other ways to force
>> perspective, and this isn't the easiest or
>> quickest of them by any means. It
>> seems to be a pointless post.
>
>> Pop
>
> Why? because it's pathetic how even big gun spam fighters get 
> trolled
== No, that's totally irrelevant and of no value spam wise OR 
child porn wise.  Spam wise, it's the PHOTO, NOT how the photo 
was made, that makes it reportable and abhorrant!  I also 
seriously doubt many "big gin" spam fighters would be "trolled" 
by that anyway, even if it was relevant to spam/pornography 
dispensing.

> by the trick.It's not their fault peoples brains are just 
> deficient to
> analyze a 3 dimensional scene in a 2d picture. I just want to
> enlighten people so they don't get trolled by the ultimate 
> troll.
==  You consider yourself the ultimate troll, don't you, you 
inmitigated piece of tripe filled with mammalian feces?  I don't 
give a turd HOW the photo was made when someone puts a 
pornographic image in front of my mother, sister, daughter, next 
door neighbor, etc..  If I could, I'd now see to it that YOUR 
family all received e very piece of it that I receive, and let 
you argue around your neighborhood or prison cell, defending it. 
If it's "real" child subjects, that's just gravy and helps to add 
to how long that perp will be in the slammer getting slammed by 
all the other slammees who hate child porn nearly as often and 
much as the general public.  Only diff is, they're more violent 
and a lot hornier.

>
> They aren't getting child porn just evidence of exploitation.
==  This is a spam group; not a child exploitation group.  Even 
so, let's say we had a photo of your mother and grandmother, put 
it thru the xray software to make them naked, and then morphed 
them until they were simultaneously using knves and spoons and 
forks to (fill in your own mental picture here).  I guess that'd 
be OK, because your mother and your grandmother didn't really do 
that, right?  So, it's OK if everyone in the world likes those 
pics, and trades them around for a few years?  Hell, most of the 
spammers sending out that crap have abs9olutely no idea where any 
of it came from, nor do they care.  It's m-o-n-e-y that matters 
to them, and nothing else unless you count not getting caught.

Thats a
> big difference!
==  Not on this group, it's not.  One is just as abhorrant as the 
other to me and to most thinking people because the innuendo is 
there.  It's not OK to call and apple an orange; if it looks like 
an orange but it's an apple, that's still  fraud and when you 
play it in the child porn rings, you play in dangerous circles.

The child porn problem is a myth.
==  You, my dear ignorant, are a myth; ical idiot of gigantic 
proportions, and I'm  not talking about that pimple between your 
legs.

Once your aware of
> forced perspective the picture don't have the same impact and 
> the
==  Wrong again, kiddie-porn breath; it's the CONTENT that gets 
perverts on, not any thought about how real or not the so called 
picture is.  Again, it matters not one iota whether the source is 
real or not; the spam crime is still there, it is illegal, and it 
is punishable.  It's gravy if the perp were actually the 
photographer.  Either way he's fried and the slamming he gets 
from other prisoners will be just as real either way.  He'd 
better have a good supply of vaseline if he gets caught.
   One of my cop friends in particular just loves it when he gets 
to testify against a kiddie porner because he knows what the poor 
sap's in for if he's convicted.  An d guess what?  Most are 
convicted, if it makes it to the courtroom.  Else they don't get 
that far.

> ultimate troll don't work.
==  Totally irrelevant, and completely off topic.

Spammers aren't dumb they aren't spreading
> evidence of felony's around so they get mandatory 
> sentences.It's all
> forced perspective tricks.
==  That one's actually comical.  Prisoners don't discriminate 
that way so he's going to have fun any way it comes out.  Those 
buzz words you managed to pick up somewhere haven't served you 
very well.  Probably about 0.001% of the porn sent out IS  really 
from the originator; nor do the senders or any willing perverted 
receivers even care!  Very few take the actual pictures, but 
millions distribute them and try to make money off them.  A horny 
toad of a bass turd doesn't care whether it was real or not; in 
his demented  mind, it's real at least until he finishes 
ejaculating over it.


 It's better to educate yourself on their
> tricks because these pictures are legal and aren't going away 
> unless
> some laws changes.
==  Education is key, all the way around, and that includes you, 
because you are seriously misinformed if you think you can make 
people believe it's OK to have child porn flying all around them 
and that the perpetrator (spammer, scammer, whatever) is NOT 
subject to prison terms, usually in a fed penitentiary since 
almost all of them cross state lines.  Child porn is bad, bad, 
bad, and the dissemination of same is bad, bad, ba; so, that way, 
you're right - it's a "d" less bad, which ain't not very much.

Now, go spew your off topic flatulence elsewhere and stop 
supporting bottom-feeding fish turds, I mean, bass turds!  You do 
know, of course, that you can go to jail for just having kiddie 
porn on your computer when your next door neighbor turns you in 
as a kiddie porn trader, don't you?  You won't get a chance to 
delete it: They take the computer and all peripherals with them a 
few seconds after your door opens, and it opens whether yo want 
it opened or not!

Disregards,