[SC-Help] Re: Forced perspective spam

[D.F. Manno]

In article <responseguard-6AD6B8.18590517012005 at news.cesmail.net>,
 "Bob W." <responseguard at hotmail.com> wrote:

> The problem is that your supposed "enlightenment" is, while possibly 
> well-intentioned, is ill-conceived and badly ill-informed.
> 
> Real child porn *is* being spamvertized.
> 
> Those who get it are free to -- and should -- report it as such.

That's all well and good, but I've noticed that all of the places you 
would report child porn to want you to give your identifying 
information. And since mere possession of child porn is a felony (at 
least in the U.S.), wouldn't I be incriminating myself by giving that 
info?
-- 
D.F. Manno
dfm2a3l0t2 at spymac.com
"The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives and the dream
will never die."