[SC-Help] Re: Forced perspective spam

[Pop]

D.F. Manno wrote:
> In article 
> <responseguard-6AD6B8.18590517012005 at news.cesmail.net>,
> "Bob W." <responseguard at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The problem is that your supposed "enlightenment" is, while 
>> possibly
>> well-intentioned, is ill-conceived and badly ill-informed.
>>
>> Real child porn *is* being spamvertized.
>>
>> Those who get it are free to -- and should -- report it as 
>> such.
>
> That's all well and good, but I've noticed that all of the 
> places you
> would report child porn to want you to give your identifying
> information. And since mere possession of child porn is a 
> felony (at
> least in the U.S.), wouldn't I be incriminating myself by 
> giving that
> info?

If you were hoarding/hosting it, yes.  Are you?  Your interest, 
in view of all the misinformation and rhetoric seems odd.

Pop