[SC-Help] Re: Forced perspective spam

[Anon_]

"Pop" <nobody at spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:csoffc$ev2$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> D.F. Manno wrote:
> > In article
> > <responseguard-6AD6B8.18590517012005 at news.cesmail.net>,
> > "Bob W." <responseguard at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The problem is that your supposed "enlightenment" is, while
> >> possibly
> >> well-intentioned, is ill-conceived and badly ill-informed.
> >>
> >> Real child porn *is* being spamvertized.
> >>
> >> Those who get it are free to -- and should -- report it as
> >> such.
> >
> > That's all well and good, but I've noticed that all of the
> > places you
> > would report child porn to want you to give your identifying
> > information. And since mere possession of child porn is a
> > felony (at
> > least in the U.S.), wouldn't I be incriminating myself by
> > giving that
> > info?
>
> If you were hoarding/hosting it, yes.  Are you?  Your interest,
> in view of all the misinformation and rhetoric seems odd.
>

**
Actually, when you read any mail, it has to have been stored on your hard
drive in order for you to process it, if it is/has been on your hard drive,
then anyone (esp. the feds) can retrieve it and BINGO you are caught as
having "saved" something illegal on your hard drive  - and of course you
know what that means when the 'boys in blue' knock on your door.

--
A SpamCop user and forum reader,
Not Admin
***

> Pop
>