[SpamCop.net - protecting the internet through technology]

[SC-Help] Re: Fake bounce defeats Spamcop (again)

Mike Easter MikeE at ster.invalid
Thu Jan 20 11:20:59 EST 2005


Martin Edwards wrote:
> I get these, and the poster's example have it in common with mine that
> the Return-path line is empty.  My guess is that that is the reason.
> Can someone more technically savvy than me help out here?

What was posted in spam [partial snippage below] looks like a bounce
header without the bounced mail body.

If you want to talk about yours, you should post its tracker.

David Purdy wrote:
> Return-Path: <>
> From: Mail Administrator <Postmaster at mailhost.ntl.com>
> Reply-To: <Postmaster at mailhost.ntl.com>
> Content-Type: multipart/report;
>   report-type=delivery-status;
>   Boundary="===========================_ _= 5283508(26517)1106169977"


-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin



More information about the SpamCop-Help mailing list