[SC-Help] Re: Forced perspective spam

[Pop]

Bob W. wrote:
> In article <csoffc$ev2$1 at news.spamcop.net>, "Pop" 
> <nobody at spamcop.net>
> wrote:
>
>> D.F. Manno wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <responseguard-6AD6B8.18590517012005 at news.cesmail.net>,
>>> "Bob W." <responseguard at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The problem is that your supposed "enlightenment" is, while
>>>> possibly
>>>> well-intentioned, is ill-conceived and badly ill-informed.
>>>>
>>>> Real child porn *is* being spamvertized.
>>>>
>>>> Those who get it are free to -- and should -- report it as
>>>> such.
>>>
>>> That's all well and good, but I've noticed that all of the
>>> places you
>>> would report child porn to want you to give your identifying
>>> information. And since mere possession of child porn is a
>>> felony (at
>>> least in the U.S.), wouldn't I be incriminating myself by
>>> giving that
>>> info?
>>
>> If you were hoarding/hosting it, yes.  Are you?  Your 
>> interest,
>> in view of all the misinformation and rhetoric seems odd.
>
> Your post, in view of the fact that DF is a regular here, seems 
> like
> trolling.
>
> Are you?

Nope.

How about you?  I don't care if he's been here since day one; 
misinformation and such attempts at starting OT conversations 
don't belong here.  DF is  a "regular", agreed; that does not 
make him good, bad, or indifferent.  It means the initials have 
been used and that's all.
   I"ve seen you around now and then for quite awhile too, but 
... to my knowledge, you show a lot more intelligence and 
attention to truthful non-confrontational situation creation than 
DF.

Let's get on to more meaningful topics and quit trying to 
posture.

Pop