[SC-Help] Re: Forced perspective spam

[Pop]

Bob W. wrote:
> In article <cssasi$tij$1 at news.spamcop.net>, "Pop" 
> <nobody at spamcop.net>
> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> Your post, in view of the fact that DF is a regular here, 
>>> seems
...
>> How about you?  I don't care if he's been here since day one;
>> misinformation and such attempts at starting OT conversations
...
>
> I don't posture.
>
> I postulate-- that your asking DF whether he is hoarding child
> pornography was an attempt to provoke.
...
> So, please feel free can join the discussion.
>
> ...Without, if you will, intimating that by discussing the 
> subject, a
> poster is involved in child pornography.
>
> Thanks.


Bob W,

What can I say other than OK, I apologize to you and to the group 
for being off-track and intolerant.  I suspect somehow there is a 
"cultural" (only word I can think of) difference between myself 
and others in the discussion and I should have simply ignored 
what  thought bothered me.  The reason I say cultural, and I wish 
I could bring up the word I really want, is because when I went 
back and re-read the post I responded to, I still felt the same 
way, but ... that's just an excuse.  It may be that I haven't 
come to "know" DF as others have here, and thus I didn't pick up 
on nuances that the rest of you did.  Therefore, I bow to the 
knowledge and considerations of yourself and others and in the 
future I will attempt to be more thoughtful.
   I abhor provoking, trolling, whatever you want to call it, and 
I agree I may have seemed that way, especially on this group.

Thank you for your calm and firm response.  I do appreciate it, 
believe it or not.  I'm pretty tired and I know that's clumsily 
worded, but it's the best I can do for the moment.  Please accept 
my apologies to DF and the other participants.  I -do- see your 
point.

Pop