[SC-Help] Inability to "forward as attachment" [was Re: Spam "from" reserved netblocks]

Sat Jul 9 19:36:52 EDT 2005

Haven't heard back yet, and I realized I should probably clarify for Mike
Easter or anyone else who is trying to figure this out...

I sent both batches (excerpted below) this morning, at 9:16 and at 9:56
Pacific time.  Each rejection message also came back at the same times -
9:16 and 9:56.  Hopefully that missing detail wasn't preventing anyone from
troubleshooting why I can't "forward as attachment".

Thanks again for looking into this ~

Sean Sowell replied:
> Mike Easter replied:
> > Sean Sowell wrote:
> ...
> > > I've been reading along and also set up mailhosts earlier today, but
> > > SpamCop wouldn't let me forward my account configuration emails as
> > > attachments. Below is the full message source of the returned
> > > message, with a few things [munged] for obvious reasons.
> >
> > Forwarding as attachment [using the menu selection, not an 'artificial'
> > multistep save as .eml, then Insert/ File attachment] from OE should be
> > working properly.  Traditionally SC's ability to handle OE's 'forward as
> > attachment' function has been very reliable.
> ...
> OK, take two.  I tried it this way as well and it does not work either.  I
> selected the twenty spamples that SpamAssassin did not catch in the past
48
> hours, right-clicked and chose the menu item 'Forward as Attachment', just
> as you instructed.  I did not add a subject or anything to the message
body.
> I just sent it striaght off to SpamCop at 0916 Pacific time.  But I
received
> a nearly identical rejection message almost immediately.  It is pasted in
> below, except that I removed all but the first spample from the end.
> ...
> > > 1.  Why don't my .eml attachments go through?
> >
> > I recommend to use your forward as attachment function as opposed to
> > saving an item as .eml and inserting it as an attachment.  If forwarding
> > as attachment isn't working correctly, there are some 'tricks' to
> > troubleshooting that here using forwarding to self and posting the
> > result into the newsgroup spamcop.spam.
> ...
>
> No, it still doesn't work.  If you could check ahead to see what might be
> going wrong, I'd appreciate it.  The first sample is the failed submission
> to my personal reporting address.
>
> The second sample (also separated by "=====") is the one that I forwarded
to
> myself the same way a few minutes ago, as you suggested above. I also
> excerpted it to keep only the first of the twenty spamples.
>
> It appears that my host's server is not letting me send emails out with
> ".eml" attachments.  If my interpretation is correct, what should I
explain
> to Hostgator about what I'm doing, so they'll be persuaded to let me send
> such attachments to SpamCop?  Or, what further steps do I need to take to
> troubleshoot the problem?
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Sean S.
>
> =====
>
> Return-path: <>
> Envelope-to: [munge]@twin-dad.com
> Delivery-date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 11:16:21 -0500
> Received: from sojs by gator16.hostgator.com with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.50)
>  id 1DrI02-0002kt-7n
>  for [munge]@twin-dad.com; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 11:16:21 -0500
> Received: from mailnull by gator16.hostgator.com with local (Exim 4.50)
>  id 1DrI02-00087i-2Q
>  for [munge]@twin-dad.com; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 11:16:18 -0500
> X-Failed-Recipients: submit.[munge]@spam.spamcop.net
> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
> From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon at gator16.hostgator.com>
> To: [munge]@twin-dad.com
> Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
> Message-Id: <E1DrI02-00087i-2Q at gator16.hostgator.com>
> Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 11:16:18 -0500
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on
>  gator16.hostgator.com
> X-Spam-Level: *
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,
>  UPPERCASE_25_50,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,
>  URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.0.4
>
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
>
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>
>   submit.[munge]@spam.spamcop.net
>     This message has been rejected because it has
>     a potentially executable attachment "Scoring houses - the easy
way!.eml"
>     This form of attachment has been used by
>     recent viruses or other malware.
>     If you meant to send this file then please
>     package it up as a zip file and resend it.
>
> ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
> ------ The body of the message is 150153 characters long; only the first
> ------ 106496 or so are included here.
>
> Return-path: <[munge]@twin-dad.com>
> Received: from c-24-4-31-126.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.4.31.126]:1609
> helo=hq02)
>  by gator16.hostgator.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.50)
>  id 1DrHzy-000744-TC
>  for submit.[munge]@spam.spamcop.net; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 11:16:18 -0500
> Message-ID: <00ce01c584a1$8a5deea0$9a0fa8c0 at hq02>
> Reply-To: "Sean Sowell" <[munge]@twin-dad.com>
> From: "Sean Sowell" <[munge]@twin-dad.com>
> To: "##spamcop-report" <submit.[munge]@spam.spamcop.net>
> Subject:
> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 09:16:15 -0700
> Organization: twin-dad.com
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>  boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CB_01C58466.DB75ACA0"
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506
> Disposition-Notification-To: "Sean Sowell" <[munge]@twin-dad.com>
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_00CB_01C58466.DB75ACA0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>  charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_00CB_01C58466.DB75ACA0
> Content-Type: message/rfc822;
>  name="Scoring houses - the easy way!.eml"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: attachment;
>  filename="Scoring houses - the easy way!.eml"
>
> Return-path: <eckkLkjZZMgA19hBSpO.388.rp at realty01.net>
> Envelope-to: [munge]@twin-dad.com
> Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:01:15 -0500
> Received: from sojs by gator16.hostgator.com with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.50)
>  id 1DqeQi-0007uQ-Tj
>  for [munge]@twin-dad.com; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:01:15 -0500
> Received: from outboundmail.realty01.net ([66.181.198.102]:33698)
>  by gator16.hostgator.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
>  id 1DqeQi-0007WO-Nz
>  for [munge]@twin-dad.com; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:01:12 -0500
> To: [munge]@twin-dad.com
> From: "Realty Ease" <eckkLkjZZMgA19hBSpO.388.rp at realty01.net>
> Subject: Scoring houses - the easy way!
> Reply-To: "Realty Ease"
>  <eckkLkjZZMgA19hBSpO.388.rpfo at realty01.net>
> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 18:01:20 -0400
> Message-Id:
>  <eckkLkjZZMgA19hBSpO.388.632563560801405000 at realty01.net>>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-type: text/plain
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Importance: Normal
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on
>  gator16.hostgator.com
> X-Spam-Level: **
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID,
>  MISSING_MIMEOLE,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=3.0.4
>
> Dear Sean Sowell,
>
> Imagine owning a brand new home at a discounted price, that someone else
> locates for you, then rent them to people which they supply as rent to
own,
> and you basically sit back and get wealthy doing it!
>
> Oh, maybe this will help even more...there's no charge!
>
> You really should have a look at this:
> http://realty01.net/eckkLkjZZMgA19hBSpO/388/37/index.php?p=b52rb3
>
>
> Best Wishes,
>
> The Realty Staff
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> J.P.Corp.
> P.O.B. 859
> Norwalk, CT. 06856
>
>
>
> If you would like to unsubscribe, please click here:
> http://realty01.net/optout.aspx?cid=388&ec=eckkLkjZZMgA19hBSpO
>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_00CB_01C58466.DB75ACA0
>
> =====
>
> Return-path: <>
> Envelope-to: [munge]@twin-dad.com
> Delivery-date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 11:56:23 -0500
> Received: from sojs by gator16.hostgator.com with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.50)
>  id 1DrIcX-0007XC-Qc
>  for [munge]@twin-dad.com; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 11:56:23 -0500
> Received: from mailnull by gator16.hostgator.com with local (Exim 4.50)
>  id 1DrIcX-0005pm-MV
>  for [munge]@twin-dad.com; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 11:56:05 -0500
> X-Failed-Recipients: [munge]@twin-dad.com
> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
> From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon at gator16.hostgator.com>
> To: [munge]@twin-dad.com
> Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
> Message-Id: <E1DrIcX-0005pm-MV at gator16.hostgator.com>
> Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 11:56:05 -0500
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on
>  gator16.hostgator.com
> X-Spam-Level: *
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,
>  UPPERCASE_25_50,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,
>  URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.0.4
>
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
>
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>
>   [munge]@twin-dad.com
>     This message has been rejected because it has
>     a potentially executable attachment "Scoring houses - the easy
way!.eml"
>     This form of attachment has been used by
>     recent viruses or other malware.
>     If you meant to send this file then please
>     package it up as a zip file and resend it.
>
> ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
> ------ The body of the message is 150153 characters long; only the first
> ------ 106496 or so are included here.
>
> Return-path: <[munge]@twin-dad.com>
> Received: from c-24-4-31-126.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.4.31.126]:1650
> helo=hq02)
>  by gator16.hostgator.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.50)
>  id 1DrIcU-0007AE-H8
>  for [munge]@twin-dad.com; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 11:56:05 -0500
> Message-ID: <016501c584a7$19ae37e0$9a0fa8c0 at hq02>
> Reply-To: "Sean Sowell" <[munge]@twin-dad.com>
> From: "Sean Sowell" <[munge]@twin-dad.com>
> To: "Sean Sowell" <[munge]@twin-dad.com>
> Subject:
> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 09:56:03 -0700
> Organization: twin-dad.com
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>  boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0162_01C5846C.6AD3B180"
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506
> Disposition-Notification-To: "Sean Sowell" <[munge]@twin-dad.com>
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0162_01C5846C.6AD3B180
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>  charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0162_01C5846C.6AD3B180
> Content-Type: message/rfc822;
>  name="Scoring houses - the easy way!.eml"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: attachment;
>  filename="Scoring houses - the easy way!.eml"
>
> Return-path: <eckkLkjZZMgA19hBSpO.388.rp at realty01.net>
> Envelope-to: [munge]@twin-dad.com
> Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:01:15 -0500
> Received: from sojs by gator16.hostgator.com with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.50)
>  id 1DqeQi-0007uQ-Tj
>  for [munge]@twin-dad.com; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:01:15 -0500
> Received: from outboundmail.realty01.net ([66.181.198.102]:33698)
>  by gator16.hostgator.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
>  id 1DqeQi-0007WO-Nz
>  for [munge]@twin-dad.com; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:01:12 -0500
> To: [munge]@twin-dad.com
> From: "Realty Ease" <eckkLkjZZMgA19hBSpO.388.rp at realty01.net>
> Subject: Scoring houses - the easy way!
> Reply-To: "Realty Ease"
>  <eckkLkjZZMgA19hBSpO.388.rpfo at realty01.net>
> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 18:01:20 -0400
> Message-Id:
>  <eckkLkjZZMgA19hBSpO.388.632563560801405000 at realty01.net>>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-type: text/plain
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Importance: Normal
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on
>  gator16.hostgator.com
> X-Spam-Level: **
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID,
>  MISSING_MIMEOLE,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=3.0.4
>
> Dear Sean Sowell,
>
> Imagine owning a brand new home at a discounted price, that someone else
> locates for you, then rent them to people which they supply as rent to
own,
> and you basically sit back and get wealthy doing it!
>
> Oh, maybe this will help even more...there's no charge!
>
> You really should have a look at this:
> http://realty01.net/eckkLkjZZMgA19hBSpO/388/37/index.php?p=b52rb3
>
>
> Best Wishes,
>
> The Realty Staff
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> J.P.Corp.
> P.O.B. 859
> Norwalk, CT. 06856
>
>
>
> If you would like to unsubscribe, please click here:
> http://realty01.net/optout.aspx?cid=388&ec=eckkLkjZZMgA19hBSpO
>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0162_01C5846C.6AD3B180
>
>