[SC-Help] Re: methods used...

[Martin Edwards]

Jeff G. wrote:
> On 6/10/2005 7:40 PM Anon_ scribbled:
> 
> 
>>"Jeff G." <anon at coks.net> wrote in message
>>news:d8dcqq$hu7$1 at news.spamcop.net...
>>
>>
>>>Following is a quote from a knowledgable fellow from another ng - whats
>>>wrong with this theory, if anything, aside from the fact that most folks
>>>don't have the time with just 30-40 spams per day?
>>>I mean, come on, in a week or two??
>>>
>>>
>>>Its simple
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Get spam.
>>>>>Go to website in spam
>>>>>     To see if it exists
>>
>>
>>**
>>Error number one - you have confirmed that YOUR e-mail address is a good,
>>live, responsive one - which guarantees that you will get MORE spam from
>>them and anyone whom they wish to sell, give, or furnish your address to.
>>
> 
> unless they decide to steer clear of you since you cause trouble, which
> seems to be a possibility.  But seems to be that ya gotta spend a lot of
> time at it, which most commonfolk don't have.
> Which is why we are here...

Just so: an interesting thread, but I'll stick with the Web form for now.