[SC-Help] Re: methods used...

[Jeff G.]

On 6/11/2005 12:24 AM Martin Edwards scribbled:

> Jeff G. wrote:
> 
>>On 6/10/2005 7:40 PM Anon_ scribbled:
>>
>>
>>
>>>"Jeff G." <anon at coks.net> wrote in message
>>>news:d8dcqq$hu7$1 at news.spamcop.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Following is a quote from a knowledgable fellow from another ng - whats
>>>>wrong with this theory, if anything, aside from the fact that most folks
>>>>don't have the time with just 30-40 spams per day?
>>>>I mean, come on, in a week or two??
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Its simple
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Get spam.
>>>>>>Go to website in spam
>>>>>>    To see if it exists
>>>
>>>
>>>**
>>>Error number one - you have confirmed that YOUR e-mail address is a good,
>>>live, responsive one - which guarantees that you will get MORE spam from
>>>them and anyone whom they wish to sell, give, or furnish your address to.
>>>
>>
>>unless they decide to steer clear of you since you cause trouble, which
>>seems to be a possibility.  But seems to be that ya gotta spend a lot of
>>time at it, which most commonfolk don't have.
>>Which is why we are here...
> 
> 
> Just so: an interesting thread, but I'll stick with the Web form for now.
As will I, since the convenience can't be matched.  Lack of concrete
results, however, is grating...