[SC-Help] Re: One more time, please...
J G
anon at coks.net
Wed Jun 15 21:32:21 EDT 2005
On 6/15/2005 8:05 PM Mike Easter scribbled:
> J G wrote:
>
>
>>At 7-9 A.M.Pacific time, I'm getting 2 minute
>>waits per parse,
>
>
> That's a bad time. If I were being delayed a lot, I wouldn't do it
> then.
>
>
>>>The disadvantage is that you have to wait for the mailforwarded
>>>items to get processed in their own sweet time. The other
>>>disadvantage is that you still have to manage the problem of
>>>accessing the numerous link/s and and the report approval process
>>>however efficient or inefficient that is.
>>
>>Heres where I got lost - does forwarding a spam, going to work and
>>coming back on cause the "unsubmitted report notice" to pop up next
>>sign on?
>
>
> If you forward spams, you come back to links which require time.
That must be the line over the input box which says you have unreported
spam - see below
>
>
>>This isn't explained anywhere I can find. Due to the system
>>dragging, I've chalked this up to a failed send in the prior session,
>>which has occured 3 or 4 times this week.
>>And the forwarding solution /doesn't/ report spamvertisers - hmmm...
>
>
> The forwarding can be done as a regular report which does report
> spamvertisers if they are resolved; or it can be done as quick which
> doesn't. If you have requested and been approved for quick.
requested and approved for "quick"? How so?
More information about the SpamCop-Help
mailing list