[SpamCop.net - protecting the internet through technology]

[SC-Help] Re: One more time, please...

J G anon at coks.net
Wed Jun 15 21:32:21 EDT 2005


On 6/15/2005 8:05 PM Mike Easter scribbled:

> J G wrote:
> 
> 
>>At 7-9 A.M.Pacific time, I'm getting 2 minute
>>waits per parse,
> 
> 
> That's a bad time.  If I were being delayed a lot, I wouldn't do it
> then.
> 
> 
>>>The disadvantage is that you have to wait for the mailforwarded
>>>items to get processed in their own sweet time.  The other
>>>disadvantage is that you still have to manage the problem of
>>>accessing the numerous link/s and and the report approval process
>>>however efficient or inefficient that is.
>>
>>Heres where I got lost - does forwarding a spam, going to work and
>>coming back on  cause the "unsubmitted report notice" to pop up next
>>sign on?
> 
> 
> If you forward spams, you come back to links which require time.

That must be the line over the input box which says you have unreported
spam - see below

> 
> 
>>This isn't explained anywhere I can find.  Due to the system
>>dragging, I've chalked this up to a failed send in the prior session,
>>which has occured 3 or 4 times this week.
>>And the forwarding solution /doesn't/ report spamvertisers - hmmm...
> 
> 
> The forwarding can be done as a regular report which does report
> spamvertisers if they are resolved;  or it can be done as quick which
> doesn't.  If you have requested and been approved for quick.


requested and approved for "quick"?  How so?


More information about the SpamCop-Help mailing list