[SpamCop.net - protecting the internet through technology]

[SC-Help] Re: [webforum]Who would spam a sneakemail?

Blammo nttp.sc.sh at bigsleep.org
Tue Jun 28 04:46:14 EDT 2005


On 27 Jun 2005 WazoO entered spamcop.help and left 
news:d9q793$2ui$1 at news.spamcop.net:

>> > not sure I want to even try to imagine lynx access.  There is the
>> > lo-fi display, but there isn't any way to log-in to that set-up.
>>
>> Huh? Why would there be no way to log in?
> 
> ??  This like the second, third, fourth (?) post you've made
> that has the appearance that you only read half of what I typed ...

OK, well just let me know if I do that, I really try to understand what 
someone is saying, I don't jump off the keyboard and reply because I got a 
hot finger (at least I try not to).

> In this case, you query "no way to log in" .... yet what I said
> was an issue with "logging into a lo-fi display" .... quite a
> difference.
> 

In english you wrote "but there isn't any way to log-in to that set-up", 
which would be part two of that sentence, like saying "lo-fi, no cookies, 
no http auth, no milk" which has four parts. so I don't understand what you 
are saying there. Now I read it all again, it looks like you are replying 
to two statements, but it comes out as one statement. I think you are 
refering to logging into the formun setup, but the connection is about as 
clear as mud (I had to read it 4 times to get that far).

> Why?  I didn't write the application.  But based on the traffic
> in the IBP support forums, the folks wanting to stick in rotating
> advertising banners, flash files in the header, JavaScript to jazz
> stuff up, requests for help on bypassing some screen controls so
> folks can add in animated graphics in their sig ..... those few of
> us that talk about limiting the crud to just plain text don't seem
> to carry much weight <g>
> 

Well, none of that has even a little to do with Lynx, since it don't 
display any of that. Lynx may show graphics links, but they can be 
suppressed, I think completely suppressed (but don't remember exactly).

Besides, placing crud at the top of your pages severly hurts your search 
engine rankings since it lowers relevence. It depends on your needs, but I 
generally put text content first, navigation second, then flash last.
I know you have limits, and I'm not real concerned anyway.

-- 
| Ric
|


More information about the SpamCop-Help mailing list