[SC-Help] Re: Links not found error

[David Butler]

"Berny" <bar_n0ne at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d54cse$ahe$1 at news.spamcop.net...
>
> "WazoO" <nobody at devnull.spamcop.net> wrote in message
> news:d53o18$r91$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> > "David Butler" <ob1db at spamcop.net> wrote in message
> > news:d53cts$ltl$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> > >
> http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z758698182ze3c4ceb0098a7a3edf35f19e8b157121z
> > >
> > > finds no links, but I can manually parse it:
> > >
> > > repeat parsing had no effect.
> > >
> > > Any ideas ?
> >
> > You mean beyond the hundreds of posts already
> > existing here, the discussions ongoing over in the
> > web-Forum????  The only actual / hard data not
> > existing yet is Julian's words ... ideas, concepts,
> > specifics, generalities .. many of these already
> > offered right here in the same newsgroups, some
> > of them even have recognizable Subject: Lines.
> >

Snip

>
>
> He was talking about the SC parser, If I read correctly he says entering
the
> link into the parser window yields the reporting addresses he showed.
>
> There really is something weird going on, I've got some spam-sites that SC
> will patiently sit and try for over a minute to parse, but it tries every
> time, and others it mostly deosn't bother with, maybe after many tries it
> will, some it parses one out of 3 or 4 times (I get a lot of repeat spanms
> for the same site, so 1st report will parse, next one doesn't. (same
site).
> If SC caches some of the name resolutions, I think there is some kind of
> problem with that part of the software.

Yes, this is what I was talking about. Since SC parsed the site individualy,
I don't see why it failed in context.

Certainly the question did not merit the prior reponses testiness...

Thanks

David