[SpamCop.net - protecting the internet through technology]

[SC-Help] Re: How many reports are there?

Frog Prince devnull at spamcop.net
Thu Oct 20 09:25:46 EDT 2005


"Don Wannit" <edb2000 at spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:dj739j$d5q$1 at news.spamcop.net...
| Frog Prince wrote:
| > "Kyle Atmore" <me at privacy.net> wrote in message
| > news:dj2pg3$plp$1 at news.spamcop.net...
| > | Great. But how many do I have sitting out there?  The link >Report
Now<
| > | takes me to one of them seemingly at random.  Would it be REALLY hard
to
| > | have it say:
| > |
| > | You have submitted 48 spams which have not yet been reported.
| > |
| > | Or something along those lines?
| > |
| > | Just suggestin'
| >
| > good idea and one that has been requested in the past.  It would be a
lot
| > more useful and likely use less CPU time that the average time of
reports.
|
|
| Truly.  Requested many times by many people, myself included.  Some
| speculation has been that the extra processing required to count 'em up
| for everyone would be excessive.  No one in a real position to know
| (i.e. Julian) has said one way or another.

You have to count/total before you can average.  Drop the average function =
fewer CPU cycles.





More information about the SpamCop-Help mailing list