[SC-Help]
Re: "User defined recipient" Checkboxes Now Checked By Default
Jeff G.
jeffg at spamcop.net
Mon Oct 31 22:47:12 EST 2005
Deputy Richard W posted the following in
http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=5277&view=findpost&p=35300
at 10:13 PM EST -0500 (about half an hour ago):
I added a user defined address into my preferences and the box is in
fact checked by default, which IIRC is opposite of what used to be done.
Changes to the user-defined report handling went live today after about
a week of testing on the beta system. Obviously the changes (which I
think Don posted about earlier) did change the default behaviour.
I'll put through a bug report on that.
Richard
--
Best Regards, Jeff G.
I have been a SpamCop User/Member/Customer since 1999 and am a
Moderator of the new web-based forums (now the primary method for
getting help, http://forum.spamcop.net). Please contact me via Forum
only"Jeff G." <jeffg at spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:dk6m0a$rcr$2 at news.spamcop.net...
> Every potential Reportee under the "Re: Forwarded Spam (User defined
> recipient)" heading is now checked by default, despite any setting of
> "3rd party report default" to the contrary. On the other hand, "(Third
> party interested in email source)" (in most cases, "Cyveillance spam
> collection") DOES respect that setting. I renew my call for a User
> Defined Recipient Report Default section in User Defined Recipient
> Report Default capability at
> http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=5152.
>
> I have emailed SpamCop Deputies and SpamCop Admin, and posted about
this
> in the "Reporting defaults have changed" Topic at
> http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=5277 .
>
> --
> Best Regards, Jeff G.
> I have been a SpamCop User/Member/Customer since 1999 and am a
> Moderator of the new web-based forums (now the primary method for
> getting help, http://forum.spamcop.net). Please contact me via Forum
> only.
>
More information about the SpamCop-Help
mailing list