[SC-Help] Re: No source IP address found, cannot proceed.

[Mike Easter]

Anon_ wrote:
> "WazoO"
>> "Anon_"

>>> Why did it parse correctly for me (now) and failed for the OP?
>>
>> Check poster's other thread in the spamcop newsgroup.

... which thread sez:

<snip>
BMW wrote:
> Ellen wrote:
>> "BMW"

>>> Still doesn't answer my question so here is yet another (in proper
format):

www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z800666612z042f3048b472e29617f368eb722ae809z

>>> It is real it has a source IP and SC doesn't believe it.  What good
>>> is this service if it doesn't work?

>> The parse looks fine to me and you mailhosts look OK. Are you seeing
>> something different?

>> Did Don make some changes for you in the mailhosts?

> Yes, I made the changes. . . Mailhost setting for "theplanet" have
> changed, much to my surprise.  Things seem to be working. Thanks for
> your help!
</snip>


Anon_ wrote:
> I had checked and did again check and NONE mentioned that anyone had
> reparsed the link successfully - with the option of sending a report
> to specific abuse desks!

You are saying 'anyone had reparsed the /link/ successfully'.  That is
ambiguous.  A link might be the tracking url, or a link might be a
spamvertised url in a particular spam.  BMW is saying things are
working, ie saying that the parser is parsing the spam.

That [where 'that' is parsing a spamvertised link inside a spam] isn't
what the conversation/thread was about.  The conversation was about what
this thread was about, which is parsing a spam, not determining a notify
for a spamvertised link.  The OP was posting about the parser failing to
parse a spam

<snip>
BMW wrote:
> What is up with SC?  I haven't been able to submit a SPAM that "got
> through" for a long time.  I always get
>
> "No source IP address found, cannot proceed."
>
> Sample =
>
http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z800666612z042f3048b472e29617f368eb722ae809z
>
> I'd appreciate any help you could offer. . .
</snip>

I think you Anon might be getting mixed up about what we are talking
about.  We are not talking about the parser failing to notify for a
spamvertised link.


-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin