[SC-Help] Re: No source IP address found, cannot proceed.

[Anon_]

"Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in message
news:df6pmp$16t$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> Anon_ wrote:
> > Top posted on purpose!
>
> You shouldn't have top posted this.  You should have trimmed and
> contextualized it for clarity for yourself and for anyone else following
> the thread and responding to it, as I am doing now.
>
> > "BMW"
>
> >> What is up with SC?  I haven't been able to submit a SPAM that "got
> >> through" for a long time.  I always get
> >>
> >> "No source IP address found, cannot proceed."
> >>
> >> Sample =
> www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z800666612z042f3048b472e29617f368eb722ae809z
>
> >> I'd appreciate any help you could offer. . .
>
> > *I* clicked on the tracking URL and it DID parse correctly with
> > addresses (with check boxes) for reporting this spam!
>
> That's because a tracking url provides a link to the original spam which
> is reparsed under the new 'conditions' if some conditions change between
> the time of an original or earlier parse and a later parse.  This is
> mentioned here  http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/32.html Why does
> SpamCop show different results from one day to the next?
>
> > Why did it parse correctly for me (now) and failed for the OP?
>
> The mailhost condition which was causing the parser to handle the
> headers improperly was corrected.
>
>

***
Are you saying that something that a third party did to their server made
the SC parser complete the parsing of all the header lines? But when the OP
originally tried the parser had failed.

If that is true then when a poster has complained about an SC parser failure
and gives the tracking URL - and I then click on the tracking URL the parser
COULD then do its job completely and satisfactorily. If this is true then
there is no way for the ng reader to see what the OP was talking about (the
problem has evaporated.)

-- 
A SpamCop user and forum reader,
Not Admin
***

> -- 
> Mike Easter
> kibitzer, not SC admin
>