[SpamCop-List] Re: SpamCop auto ignored

[Paradox]

On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 12:04:12 -0800, Argyle <service>
wrote:

>Who Cares? wrote:
>> 
>> Just last week I got a spam coming from postmastergeneral.com and got
>> the same autoack -- also tried to do it two ways, giving them the
>> clean E-mail and the munged one. It did not work both ways, I think
>> Julian needs to call them and give them a clue.
>
>Err, why don't *you* call them?  I can't call everyone who needs a
>clue.  Sometimes I adopt-a-spammer, but I can't adopt them all
>personally.  I already (try to) educate the ones who call me.
>
>-=Julian "I'm a busy guy" Haight=-

I bet you get a lot of calls from spammers that need an education or
clue :) ie those that are angry about getting caught by SpamCop.
I'm very willing to adopt the postmastergeneral spamhaus as my mission
in life, until they get clued in, but it would really help if the
SpamCop function could be coded so that the postmastergeneral spam
reports were also automatically sent to their sevice provider -
abuse
Knowing that the abuse address nospam is auto
ignored, is it possible to add abuse to the reports sent
out about postmastergeneral?
Then SpamCop users would know that at least one of the reports being
sent out about postmastergeneral abuse was not ignored.