[SpamCop-List] Re: SpamCop auto ignored

[Argyle]

Paradox wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 17:23:56 -0500, Margie Arbon
> <margie> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 22:02:54 GMT, anon (Paradox) wrote in
> ><3a79dc79.25363278>:
> >
> >>Knowing that the abuse address nospam is auto
> >>ignored, is it possible to add abuse to the reports sent
> >>out about postmastergeneral?
> >>Then SpamCop users would know that at least one of the reports being
> >>sent out about postmastergeneral abuse was not ignored.
> >
> >SpamCop users need to send manual reports to those ISPs and NSPs that do
> >not accept SpamCop reports.  Abuse desks have the right to not accept
> >munged data.  Failure to accept SpamCop reports is not a good reason to
> >complain to an upstream.
> >
> >JMHO.
> 
> Margie,
> 
> I have to disagree. postamstergeneral.com is not an isp it is a
> spamhaus that thinks it has risen above any problems with spam
> complaints from Spamcop or any other source by registering itself as
> the abuse address.

This is a debate which I'll leave in the capable hands of abuse.net. 
I'm not trying to reinvent the wheel here.

-=Julian=-