[SpamCop-List] Re: Google Acquires Deja's Usenet Discussion Service, now includes SpamCop NGs

[@>-->-->--]

x-no-archive: yes

FWIW, Google claims they honor the  x-no-archive: yes

"Bob W." <responseguard> wrote in message
news:responseguard-4EA29D.13575712022001
> In article <969ljo$gcu$1>,
> foghat (Who  Cares?) wrote:
>
> > In article <responseguard-9CB77B.13101512022001>,
> > Bob W. <responseguard> wrote:
> > >In article <969io9$ei8$1>, "News Admin"
> > ><news> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > >\me votes for blocking.  :)
>
> <snip>
>
> > Erm. That's /me..
>
> Erm... Thanks for catching the typo. I feel special now.  <g>  You
may
> notice I tend to get it right in my other posts.  :P
>
> > and I agree. Spamcop is designed for privacy issues, not for
> > spammers to continue to harvest unmunged E-mails. If we have to
give that
> > up,
> > at least design a way to munge ALL email addresses posted here for
> > Google's archiving.
>
> Oooohhhh... Is that possible? Huh! Sounds interesting...
>
> ...Bob W.
> (SpamCop user, not an admin)