[SpamCop-List] (no subject)

[spamcop-list@news.spamcop.net]

Well, first, did you attempt to reply to a "don't send me any more
spam" address on spam you received?

a) It's futile because many times the mailbox is invalid or full, and
this message is probably the result of that.

OR

b) It's stupid because replying to one of these addresses simply
verifies your email and generates more spam.

Either way, just report the crap and be done with it--do NOT use the
remove address.

On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:17:04 -0800, John Meshkoff <johnm>
wrote:

>Hello, I received this spam which shows "Subject: DELIVERY FAILURE".  I'm
>not knowledgeable on the finer points of e-mail-system details I see
>discussed on this list, and don't understand what's happening with this
>particular mail, it's the first I've seen like this.  I'm not sure a mail
>like this could be processed correctly by spamcop, so haven't tried to put
>it in.  I'm just looking for some elucidation from those of you with
>expertise on the subject.
>
>(headers only pasted in)
>
>>Received: from imat3.imatron.com (imat3 [192.58.248.250])
>>	by imat2.imatron.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA09081
>>	for <johnm>; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:29:26 -0800 (PST)
>>Received: from jasmin.kumhopnb.co.kr ([203.238.72.1])
>>	by imat3.imatron.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA02129
>>	for <johnm>; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:28:43 -0800 (PST)
>>Received: from 203.238.72.1 ([192.187.236.176])
>>          by jasmin.kumhopnb.co.kr (Lotus Domino Build 166.1)
>>          with SMTP id 2001022207232656:6321 ;
>>          Thu, 22 Feb 2001 07:23:26 +0900 
>>To: amanda3
>>Date: Wed, 21 Feb 01 13:52:12 EST
>>From: Postmaster
>>Subject: DELIVERY FAILURE: haer.nach.com µµ¸ÞÀÎÀÇ °æ·Î¸¦ ãÀ» ¼ö
>¾ø½À´Ï´Ù(HEAD/VICS
>> ¼­¹ö¿¡¼­). ÁÖ¼Ò·Ï¿¡¼­ ¼­¹ö ¹®¼­, Á¢¼Ó ¹®¼­, µµ¸ÞÀÎ ¹®¼­¸¦ È®ÀÎÇϽʽÿÀ.
>>Reply-To: amanda3
>>X-PMFLAGS: Mozilla 4.5 [en] C-CCK-MCD {U S WEST.net} {Win95}
>>X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on HEAD/VICS(Release 5.0|1999. 4. 14)
>at 2001-02-22
>> 07:23:29 AM,
>>	Serialize by Router on HEAD/VICS(Release 5.0|1999. 4. 14) at 2001-02-22
>11:20:56
>> AM,
>>	Serialize complete at 2001-02-22 11:20:56 AM
>>Message-ID: <9485120351.wsd68452>
>>X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
>boundary="==IFJRGLKFGIR21697UHRUHIHD"
>>X-UIDL: f8465346d728fj89ol20b0e653db875
>>
>>Your message
>>
>>  Subject: More Sales + You Are Pre-Approved And....
>>
>>was not delivered to:
>>
>>  pero
>>
>>because:
>>
>>  haer.nach.com µµ¸ÞÀÎÀÇ °æ·Î¸¦ ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù(HEAD/VICS
>¼­¹ö¿¡¼­). ÁÖ¼Ò·Ï¿¡¼­ ¼­¹ö ¹®¼­, Á¢¼Ó ¹®¼­, µµ¸ÞÀÎ
>¹®¼­¸¦ È®ÀÎÇϽʽÿÀ.
>>Reporting-MTA: dns;jasmin.kumhopnb.co.kr
>>
>>Final-Recipient: rfc822;pero
>>Action: failed
>>Status: 5.0.0
>>Diagnostic-Code: X-Notes; haer.nach.com µµ¸ÞÀÎÀÇ °æ·Î¸¦ ãÀ» ¼ö
>¾ø½À´Ï´Ù(HEAD/VICS ¼­¹ö¿¡¼­). ÁÖ¼Ò·Ï¿¡¼­ ¼­¹ö ¹®¼­, Á¢¼Ó
>¹®¼­, µµ¸ÞÀÎ ¹®¼­¸¦ È®ÀÎÇϽʽÿÀ.
>>Received: from 203.238.72.1 ([192.187.236.176])
>>          by jasmin.kumhopnb.co.kr (Lotus Domino Build 166.1)
>>          with SMTP id 2001022207232656:6321 ;
>>          Thu, 22 Feb 2001 07:23:26 +0900 
>>To: kathysue22
>>Date: Wed, 21 Feb 01 13:52:12 EST
>>From: amanda3
>>Subject: More Sales + You Are Pre-Approved And....
>>Reply-To: amanda3
>>X-PMFLAGS: Mozilla 4.5 [en] C-CCK-MCD {U S WEST.net} {Win95}
>>X-UIDL: f8465346d728fj89ol20b0e653db875
>>X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on HEAD/VICS(Release 5.0|1999. 4. 14)
>at 2001-02-22
>> 07:23:29 AM,
>>	Serialize by Router on HEAD/VICS(Release 5.0|1999. 4. 14) at 2001-02-22
>11:20:56
>> AM,
>>	Serialize complete at 2001-02-22 11:20:56 AM
>>Message-ID: <9485120351.wsd68452>
>>X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>
>>INCREASE BUSINESS BY 30% TO 100%
>>JUST BY ACCEPTING CREDIT CARDS!
>>
>
>-----------------------------------
>John Meshkoff <johnm>
>IMATRON, INC., 389 Oyster Point Blvd.	  	
>So. San Francisco, CA 94080, USA	
>Phone: (650)583-9964         Fax: (650)827-7788