[SpamCop-List] Re: Bouncing spam
Sat Feb 8 00:24:16 EST 2003
Miss Betsy wrote:
>David Dean wrote...
>>The above is my understanding of what "Guy" was suggesting. Please
>>help me understand what is wrong with this idea.
>That only works if you have a domain. I don't and I think I could use
>Mailwasher or manually send reject messages to the spam I receive.
Why are you replying to a question about "what Guy was suggesting"
with a reply about Mailwasher? How many times do I have to explain
that I am not taliking about what Mailwasher does? I am suggesting
returning RFC-1893-Compliant Mail System Status Codes with a Class
Sub Code of "Permanent Failure" and a Subject Sub Code of "Delivery
not authorized, message refused." Not the same thing at all. Not
even close. Did I mention that I am not talking about Maulwasher?
<taps microphone> Hello? Is this thing on?
More information about the SpamCop-List