[SpamCop-List] Re: Nanae on SpamCop
Brian K. O'Neill
briank.o at prodigy.net
Sat Feb 22 18:15:42 EST 2003
"Spambo" <dj9mevb4gw0001 at sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:3E57F6C3.3BB4FDE8 at sneakemail.com...
> > 2) The abuse desk that has the information it doesn't need can forward
> > spam victim's information to the spammer. There are documented cases of
> > abuse desks doing exactly that.
> I want to expand on this point a bit -- imagine if those charged with
> investigating & enforcing reported violations of society's 'rules' had a
> policy of ignoring all anonymous tips. And, what if they also provided
> the accused with a guarantee not to divulge any information about him to
> anyone unless they were absolutely forced to do it - while all along
> they'd attempt to gather the information necessary for the perpetrator
> to ensure the victim never accused him again.
> Thank heavens the real world doesn't think like an ISP that refuses
> munged spam reports.
TIME ELAPSED SINCE I QUIT SMOKING:
Two years, ten months, one week, six days, 20 hours, 15 minutes and 35
41993 cigarettes not smoked, saving $5,249.43.
Life saved: 20 weeks, 5 days, 19 hours, 25 minutes.
See my Sig File FAQ: http://pages.prodigy.net/briank.o/SigFAQ.htm
More information about the SpamCop-List