[SpamCop-List] Re: Spamcop. An agent for spammers.
mcwebber at my-deja.com
Thu Feb 27 22:20:05 EST 2003
"Darwin" <darwin at netmadeira.com> wrote in message
news:b3mkdo$hh7$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> "McWebber" <mcwebber at my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:b3jcmc$q4s$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> > "Sam Spade" <SamSpade at NoSpam.Net> wrote in message
> > news:3E5D0814.3030702 at NoSpam.Net...
> > > >
> > > Read it again, and notice what it says about faxes. Then set your
> > up to automatically print received emails and
> > > you're now covered by the facsimile legislation.
> > According to?: (choose one)
> > A. Court ruling setting such a precedent.
> > B. Lawyer advising you of that.
> > C. I just made it up because it sounded good.
> Actually the answer is A.
> This was posted a few days ago in Spamcop by Larry Kilgallen:
> > Slashdot points out a reported victory in Michigan Small Claims Court
> > by using the Junk Fax Law against a spammer.
Small claims court rulings are not precendent.
No email replies read
If someone tells you to forward an email to all your friends
please forget that I'm your friend.
More information about the SpamCop-List