[SpamCop-List] Re: make love not spam - I prefer another method

[Berny]

"brewman" <nobody at devnull.spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:cormji$8b2$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> "N. Miller" <tdy at blackhole.invalid> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1c1a6c74a81c70f98977d at news.spamcop.net...
> > Spamvertised sites come and go. Some spammers burn through domains
> > like a
> > kid burns through his Halloween candy. Lycos hasn't done squat to
> > stop the
> > spammers because they change domains more often than Imelda Marcos
> > changed
> > shoes.
>
> Well, after months of reporting spam and not making a dent in the spam
> I received (several dozen a day), I got myself an uncapped ADSL line
> (2 actually, but that's another story) and started using SpamVampire
> on the spamvertised site, passing through to the REAL site and
> ignoring any zombies; I think it unfair to attack a zombied machine
> whose bandwidth the spammer isn't paying for anyway.
>
> SNIPPED

Well, If I had the skills, I would use trojanned machines to DDOS
spamvertizers.

My volume of spam is to the point of a DDOS on my mail accounts. I no longer
sympathise with the compromised machine owners. If they get cut off by their
ISP's and clean up their hosts all the better. If they simply stay cut off
that's fine too., one less spam delivery vector.

And No don't tell me about filters, having to poke through the Sh*te folder
to find false positives is no improvement on poking through my inbox ,which,
with my filters and whitelists, is now better than 99.95% spam.only.

Spamcop mail is not an option for me,  due to security policy my corporate
accounts cannot be forwarded or retrieved by SC.