[SpamCop-List] Re: make love not spam - I prefer another method

[David 1]

Berny wrote:
> "brewman" <nobody at devnull.spamcop.net> wrote in message
> news:cormji$8b2$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> 
>>"N. Miller" <tdy at blackhole.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:MPG.1c1a6c74a81c70f98977d at news.spamcop.net...
>>
>>>Spamvertised sites come and go. Some spammers burn through domains
>>>like a
>>>kid burns through his Halloween candy. Lycos hasn't done squat to
>>>stop the
>>>spammers because they change domains more often than Imelda Marcos
>>>changed
>>>shoes.
>>
>>Well, after months of reporting spam and not making a dent in the spam
>>I received (several dozen a day), I got myself an uncapped ADSL line
>>(2 actually, but that's another story) and started using SpamVampire
>>on the spamvertised site, passing through to the REAL site and
>>ignoring any zombies; I think it unfair to attack a zombied machine
>>whose bandwidth the spammer isn't paying for anyway.
>>
>>SNIPPED
> 
> 
> Well, If I had the skills, I would use trojanned machines to DDOS
> spamvertizers.
> 
> My volume of spam is to the point of a DDOS on my mail accounts. I no longer
> sympathise with the compromised machine owners. If they get cut off by their
> ISP's and clean up their hosts all the better. If they simply stay cut off
> that's fine too., one less spam delivery vector.
> 
> And No don't tell me about filters, having to poke through the Sh*te folder
> to find false positives is no improvement on poking through my inbox ,which,
> with my filters and whitelists, is now better than 99.95% spam.only.
> 
> Spamcop mail is not an option for me,  due to security policy my corporate
> accounts cannot be forwarded or retrieved by SC.
> 
> 
What about MailWasher, seems to work for me & because it is usually spam 
cop compatible (usually for the last week I haven't been able to send to 
sc) the learning filter actually works real good & since it's on your 
machine that should take care of your Corp. Problem????????
David 1