[SpamCop-List] Re: Filters could become illegal under CAN-SPAM

[Socks the Whitehouse Cat]

Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of
spamcop  will discover that Uncle StoatWarbler
<alanb+google4 at digistar.com> had this to say on 01 Feb 2004: 

> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 01:20:06 +0000, Bert Byfield wrote:
> 
>> Yep. Spam is free speech -- so far.
> 
> Blocking spam is also free speech - and asserting private property
> rights, and asserting your freedom of association (along with freedom
> to not associate with those you do not wish to) (Cyberpromo vs AOL)
> 

not to mention the Boy Scouts vs gays decision.  



-- 
      officially recognized SPEWS puppet
       ISO certification and everything
                  I AM SPEWS 
(SLAPP PREVENTION ELECTRONIC WHITENOISE SYSTEM)