[SpamCop-List] Standard template for SC spamvertised site comments fields?

[Simon Hawking]

Do people use a standardised template for the 'spamvertised' site comments
field when reporting their spam?

At present I have been using a standard template for Software piracy and
falsified WHOIS details - for know repeat offenders.

--- False WHOIS ---
The registrant of <domain name> is using false WHOIS registration details.
As such they may also have paid, or be paying for hosting using similar
fraud/criminal activity.

You are advised not to do business with this individual, and ensure that
their TRUE details are listed in the WHOIS database. Doing business with
this individual *could* damage the reputation of your business, and/or
implicate your business in their criminal activities.

--------------



--- Software Piracy ---
The registrant of <domain name> *appears* to be involved in software piracy.
It is also likely that the registrant is using false domain registration
details. As such they may also have paid, or be paying for hosting using
similar fraud/criminal activity.

You are advised not to do business with this individual, and ensure that
their TRUE details are listed in the WHOIS database. Doing business with
this individual *could* damage the reputation of your business, and/or
implicate your business in their criminal activities.

--------------



As far as I am aware this is OK by SC TOS.

Should I adopt a similar approach to other 'spamvertised' sites from spam I
report?  If so, what wording is best to use for such a template?



Simon
Remove nouce to mail