[SpamCop-List] Re: eBay scam
nobody at spamcop.net
Sun Feb 22 14:20:31 EST 2004
"Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in message
news:c1al2e$p5t$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> WazoO wrote:
> > I have no idea who in this group would have suggested the
> > underscore.
> I didn't /suggest/ it, but I have seen it suggested by others in
> alt.spam; I think Munger Joe. I also /think/ his opinion is correct
no arguement, but I did say "here" <g>
> that it [where 'it' is inclusion of any illegal domainname chars] 'fits'
> general usenet mungeing suggestions for using an invalid domainname
> should be used instead of some 'imaginary' domainname which might
> currently be valid or valid at some time in the future. So, in a
> previous thread, when someone asked, I said that that munge should be a
> satisfactory one.
> > Per Julian's suggestion, which makes it a pretty hard rule, if you're
> > going to mung your address in here, then the address offered is
> > nobody at spamcop.net
> The business about nobody at sc just 'sprung up' as local lore. It
> isn't written down anywhere but newsgroup posts.
If you'd pin me down with a question, I would have actually
sworn that Julian had made it a point to some poster in these
newsgroups, but I'm dating that occurrence back to the days
when he was a regular poster .. that timeframe just after the
AnyBoard days ... and I still can't put that into a calendar
mark, man it's just been too long ago <g>
More information about the SpamCop-List