[SpamCop-List] Re: Web-based forum test
rr at 8x.ca
Wed Jan 21 01:28:09 EST 2004
"Marjolein Katsma <nobody at spamcop.net>" wrote in spamcop.help:
> Randolf Richardson (rr at 8x.ca) wrote in
> news:Xns94768CE7FFCCDrr8xca at 188.8.131.52:
[sNip -- points I agree with]
>> If the web-based and NNTP-based discussions use the same
>> repository, or have a reliable synchronization mechanism, then I'd
>> consider this to be the very best solution.
> In general, I agree, but for newsgroup-related problems I do think it's
> better to *avoid* the NNTP-based interface; that won't trip up users who
> are used to NNTP "at all times" when suddenly it's the news server
> having a problem. Of course that means the system would need a
> repository that remains working even if one of the interfaces gives the
I agree. Thus, "a reliable sychronization mechanism" is obviously the
more suitable solution -- I wasn't thinking of the requirement for
independent stability until you pointed out the need for it.
> (is that an experssion in English?).
Works for me! =D
Randolf Richardson - rr at 8x.ca
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
"We are anti-spammers. You will confirm
subscriptions. Resistance is futile."
Please do not eMail me directly when responding
to my postings in the newsgroups.
More information about the SpamCop-List