[SpamCop-List] Re: Parser Suggestion (Maybe)

[Anti-Spam]

"Leon Mayne" <l.rmvmayne at uea.ac.uk> wrote in message news:bujhm1$13o$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> Anti-Spam wrote:
> > When reporting, I've been in the habit of
> > unchecking some of the domains I suspect
> > of belonging to or supporting spammers.
> > Question is: does this screw up the SC stats,
> > or should I stop?  Or maybe the parser could
> > use a "mole" option for each individual report
> > addressee.
> >
> > Are many other people doing this?  There may
> > have been a few posts to this effect, in the last
> > little while.  (I'm not sure whether or not the
> > unchecking has helped or not.  More on that
> > experiment when I have enough data.)
>
> This will still put the spammy IP into the dnsbl, so it is still helping.
> The only difference is that the ISP will not receive a report which they can
> use to find and remove spammers on their network. If they don't care about
> the spammers, or are supporting them, then there's not much point sending
> them a report anyway!

My rationale for not LARTing to certain ISPs, is
because my address subsequently _seems_ to
get added to MORE spam lists, in spite of SC
munging.  The question is I've never been in a
position to _prove_ particular ISPs are problems.

--
.sig
Fake spambait addr: our63 at hslnol.net
(generated by Webpoison)