[SpamCop-List] Re: SC fails to detect URL in spam email

Tue Jan 27 12:10:11 EST 2004

Blammo (ric.gates at bigsleep.org) wrote in news:Xns947CC04788AD6blammo@
216.154.195.61:

>> I was assuming that it probably was text/html, but my answer could be 
>> wrong, and in that case the headers would be important.
>> 
> 
> I just got it myself. It is text/html but no <HTML> or <BODY>.

Not required (unless it's XHTML).

-- 
Marjolein Katsma - Amsterdam, NL - http://hshelp.com/
Spammers steal resources: they're my enemy.
Cyveillance steals resources: they're my enemy.
The enemy of my enemy can be my enemy, too.