[SpamCop-List] RFC ignorant?

[Marjolein Katsma]

Should this go to rfc-ignorant? Note the From: they add is the very 
address that failed!

~~~~~~~

From: postmaster at tvglobo.com.br
To: <munged>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:25:15 -0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
	boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C3DD9E41FEEB240001892Djb?w2k?con?p01.c"
X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4458 - 00000001 - 80040546
Message-ID: <109RCQwXm00002174 at jb-w2k-con-p01.corp.tvglobo.com.br>
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
X-UIDL: 5AO!!@^^"!NSG!!cp_!!

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Delivery to the following recipients failed.

       postmaster at tvglobo.com.br



Reporting-MTA: dns;jb-w2k-con-p01.corp.tvglobo.com.br
Received-From-MTA: dns;mrelay.jb.redeglobo.
Arrival-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:25:15 -0200

Final-Recipient: rfc822;postmaster at tvglobo.com.br
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
(...)
~~~~~~~


-- 
Marjolein Katsma - Amsterdam, NL - http://hshelp.com/
Spammers steal resources: they're my enemy.
Cyveillance steals resources: they're my enemy.
The enemy of my enemy can be my enemy, too.