[SpamCop-List] Re: Tricky!
anette at notexisting.net
Sun Jul 4 02:09:55 EDT 2004
> What you wrote up there is 'ambiguous' to me; I don't know whether it
> is 2003 Mar 7 or 2003 July 3.
the first as it was yesterday. Not everyone lives in your timezone (where
date notation always is different from ours)
> If the latter, then 'something' got its date set on the wrong year; if
> the former, there is more confusion.
> When SC examines a spam, it does *not* use the date stamped in the Date:
> section, but it uses the date stamped by the topmost received traceline,
> which is usually your own server which you get mail from.
that makes sense; therefore I just didn't get it.
> If your server is stamping its timestamp wrong, your spam will be
> rejected like that.
GMT+1 must make not that difference ?
> It is impossible to describe something as well as pasting the real
are you a Vulcan ? I hate wordgames...
More information about the SpamCop-List