[SpamCop-List] Re: Can I block this IP?

[Paul Johnson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Steven Maesslein <nobody at nowhere.invalid> writes:

> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:02:05 -0700, Paul Johnson coughed into spamcop
> and left this in <87fz7z2teq.fsf at ursine.ca>:
>
>> Sure it is.  You cause collateral damage to small sites that can't
>> afford static hosting.  They do exist.
>
> And they should route their outbound mail through a static IP. There's 
> no such thing as an ISP (worth its salt) that gives out dynamic IP 
> addresses and no SMTP service.

I'm really not a fan of how horrible ISPs are at running SMTP servers.
If any ISP had a clue and didn't charge more than I make, then I might
have a different opinion.  I get listed less often than my ISP's SMTP
servers does.

>> No, it's retarded because there is no reason to cause collateral damage,
>> and yet you're doing so.
>
> What collateral damage? He said in <news:ccms2k$s9e$1 at news.spamcop.net> 
> that he hadn't had a single false positive.

I watch the reject logs.  My reject messages do tell people how to get
around it.  I don't get complaints about lost mail.  I'm watching for
false positives, they're just not happening.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA8a1OUzgNqloQMwcRAisCAJ9o5EawD9NB3ZWqw1C2911r+c+eNQCeO40k
fFqW9+GuAqTcrFfomuLae4M=
=eH71
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----