Re: This message looks like a bounce, will not report.
eddie at eddie.web
Wed Jul 21 00:38:22 EDT 2004
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:24:49 -0400, Glenn Daniels scratched out the
> This raises a question for me, although I always submit my spams as I get
> them, unmunged. Then, when I see them after SC looks at them, they are all
> munged anyway. I get plenty of spam with nothing at all or random words in
> the "Subject:" header. So the question is, is it a no-no to munge the
> "Subject:" header, as, is that considered a "substantive" alteration, or
> is that an acceptable "fixup"? If indeed it is a "no-no", I could still
> manually report Spammy to his identified ISP, yes?
Beats me. I would naively assume that adding a space in the subject so it
parses is not substantive, but I'm just a user of SC. Someone from the top
Actually though, SC should not be believing the subject of the spam, not
matter what is says. If the spam is really a bounce, I think the header
would indicate that, so I would call it another SC bug.
More information about the SpamCop-List